详解美国专利权有效性的审查程序

[3]PTAB, Andersen Corp. v. GED Integrated Solutions Inc., DER2017-00007.Paper 32 (P.T.A.B. March

21.2018)

[4]Ex Parte reexamination historical statistics (Updated 3/2021) , https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/docu

ments/ex_parte_historical_stats_roll_up_21Q1.pdf，最后访问时间：

[5]Trial Statistics, IPR, PGR, CBM, https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/docu

ments/Trial_Statistics_2019-10-31.pdf，最后访问时间：

[6]Boardside Chats - New Developments (uspto.gov)，见Statistics | USPTO，最后访问时间：

[7]Boardside Chats - New Developments (uspto.gov)，和https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/docu

ments/Trial_Statistics_2019-10-31.pdf，见Statistics | USPTO，最后访问时间：

[8]SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 584 U.S. (2018)

[9]PTAB by the numbers: A closer look at the most recent PTAB AIA trial statistics, Fabian Koenigbauer, January

23.2020.https://www.ipintelligencereport.com/2020/01/23/ptab-by-the-numbers-a-closer-look-at-the-most-recent-ptab-aia-trial-statistics/，最后访问时间：

[10]Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein Fox, February 2020.2019 PTAB Year in Review: Analysis T rends, https://www.sternekessler.com/news-insights/publications/success-motions-stay-rising-why

[11]AIA § 18(b)

[12]See Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., IPR2020-00019.Paper 11 (PTAB Mar.

20.2020).

[13]同10

[14]Wasica Fin. GmbH v. Cont’l Auto. Sys., Inc., 853 F.3d 1272 (Fed. Cir 2017).

[15]Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc)

[16]PTAB issues claim co

nstruction final rule, https://www.uspto.gov/patents/ptab/procedures/ptab-issues-claim-construction, 最后访问时间：

[17]见 Slide 1 (straffordpub.com)，最后访问时间：

[18]Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, 872 F.3d 1290.1327-28 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (en banc)